UCLA Jihad Misconception from The Original Purpose Essay
Question Description
Below I provided single key argument summarized into a thesis statement. Your job will be to write a 400 word response this thesis statement in which you either agree, disagree, or otherwise make an argument about the idea question. No sitting on the fence try to pick a single claim and defend it. The challenge will be to persuasively explain what you think and why you think that way.
(Roxanne Euben, Killing (for) Politics, p. 8)
The repetitive invocation of the terrors of jihad by pundits, journalists, politicians, and scholars alike is, however, as much about projection as prejudice. Emptied of specific content, in the end jihad comes to say much more about the shoring up of an idealized Western public sphere in which reasoned arguments and nonviolent practices largely prevail as much as they describe what jihad “really is.
***I also attached below the reading that you have to use and the citation format as well.
******AND DO NOT JUST SUMMARIZE the reading, Try to take a stance on what the author is saying and then use your response to defend your opinion. The point and the challenge of writing this is to convince your argument.
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
