SMC The Debate over Reparations Discussion
Description
This assignment focuses on a debate over reparations (Links to an external site.) In 2014, Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote a widely-commented upon piece in
The Atlantic called The Case for Reparations “in which he argues FOR reparations. Many writers subsequently penned responses, including Kevin D. Williamson, whose article–The Case Against Reparations” takes the opposite stance, and will be the focus of this short assignment.
Write a 250-word, typed response in which you answer the following questions.
- What is Williamsons overall argument in “The Case Against Reparations”?
- What specific points in Coatess piece does he address in this article? How does he refute these specific points?
- What evidence does Williamson draw on to make his case against Coates?
- Do you find Williamsons argument persuasive? Why or why not?
Have a similar assignment? "Place an order for your assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, guaranteeing you A results."
Complete the 
Complete the order payment after filling in the order form. We’ll receive your order and assign it to a writer.
The assigned writer will complete your paper and forward it to our Editing Team for review and approval.
Once approved by the editor, the completed paper will be uploaded to your account for you to download, review and approve.