Rutgers University Current Moral and Social Issues Paper

(1) In the paper “Enhancement and Cheating” the authors argue for an interpretative approach to help navigate the ethics of pharmacological enhancements in sport. What is this approach, how do they argue for it, and do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer

(2) In the paper “Enhancement and Cheating” the authors discuss the Riggs V Palmer case. What purpose does this case serve for the authors? Explain your answer

(3) In the paper “Enhancement and Cheating” the authors discuss Gwen Bradford’s view on achievements, what role do achievements play in the authors argument? Explain your answer.

(4) In “Moral Enhancements: Do Means Matter Morally” the authors argue against direct, passive moral enhancements. In the response piece, the author argues against their position. Which do you agree with and why? Explain your answer