About 200 words: The questions are: 1. Some have thought that because Humeàradical empiricism leads to skepticism about such things as the existence of the mind and causality, that therefore there must be something radically wrong with it.  What do you think of this comment?  2.  Some have said that the way of Kant allows us to bracket off the difficult questions of what things are really like in reality and to substitute this for the question how must things appear to us in our minds.  Do you think that this makes metaphysics (the philosophical study of reality) unnecessary? Remember it is important to reply back to any questions I or others raise to your posts. No use of artificial intelligence is allowed such as chatgpt, no plagiarism, and no paraphrasing. Immediate zero. Read and Re-read pages 161-243. The book we use is: An Invitation to Philosophy, by Ed. Miller and John Jensen, McGraw-Hill, 2009, sixth edition  (Please note that you can only use this edition for the course.  Earlier editions will not work)   Please understand that purchase and use of the textbook is a requirement for the course.  You cannot do the course by simply using other sources available on-line.